BEGPAN6.CVP 931103 Getting Help This is *very* difficult. Who do you turn to? Who do you trust? Who can help? Do not automatically trust your local repair shop. Computer retail, rental and repair outfits have become significant vectors for viral spread. They may very well have superlative skills in diagnosis and repair, but being able to put a computer together, or take it apart and find out why it isn't working, is not the same as study and research in the virus field. The number of experienced and knowledgeable virus researchers in the entire world is probably less than one hundred: the number of "instant experts" on the basis of possession of an out-of-date scanning program is in the hundreds of thousands. The preceding may be seen as a slap at computer repair people. It is in no way intended to be so. The point that I am trying to make is that knowledge about viral programs is extremely specialized. Computer repair is highly skilled and specialized itself--but not in the virus area. Nor is this to say that help desk personnel, computer consultants, systems integrators or even data security specialists, have any advantage in dealing with viral programs, unless they have made specific study in the field. Enough with the bad news. Where *can* you find help? The only place to get accurate and timely information, for most people, is from the virus discussion groups on computer networks. I am referring to the international networks; the Internet and Fidonet; rather than commercial systems, no matter how large. Compuserve has at least three "virus" related forums: all are merely technical support venues for specific commercial products. Of the various "virus" discussions on commercial systems I am only aware of two with any substance. Therefore, whoever you call on for help should have access to, and read regularly, VIRUS-L on the Internet, comp.virus on Usenet and either VIRUS, VIRUS_INFO or WARNINGS on Fidonet, or VirNet which uses Fidonet technology. It is, of course, very easy to *say* that you keep up with the latest research and not quite as easy to test the statement. Here is a quick check. At the risk of sounding like I have an ego the size of Manhattan: if they don't know me, it is highly unlikely that they know the field. No, I am not just a conceited windbag trying to blow my own horn. I could easily name a dozen people who are more expert than I (and would immediately get into trouble by *not* naming a dozen more, equally qualified, whose names momentarily escaped me). The point is that I post articles on a weekly basis (or better) to pretty well anywhere of any significance. On second thought, maybe the fact that I am *not* one of the big names is an advantage. If they know me, they really do read *all* of the information. copyright Robert M. Slade, 1993 BEGPAN6.CVP 931103 ============= Vancouver ROBERTS@decus.ca | "The only thing necessary Institute for Robert_Slade@sfu.ca | for the triumph of evil Research into rslade@cue.bc.ca | is for good men to do User p1@CyberStore.ca | nothing." Security Canada V7K 2G6 | - Edmund Burke