<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-CA link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>My apologies… In fact, Canada Post is still a Crown Corporation (which is I guess half way between being the government department it was until the 1960’s and the fully private enterprise folks like the Fraser Institute would like to see it become).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Evidently there is considerable criticism of the current CEO of CPO Deepak Chopra (formerly Pres. of Pitney Bowes Canada) who has been looking to operate it on “efficiency/commercial” rather than “pubic interest” principles by the Community Power folks (who it appears represent the major CPO union CUPW). The Trudeau government request for late stage Harper re-appointments to offer their resignation particularly singled out Chopra but he in turn has refused to budge from his appointment which I believe now runs to 2021.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>(I’m not sure the overall direction of my comment changes very much though… It is unlikely given the current CEO and direction of CPO that the proposals would be implemented on the other hand, if Chopra were to be removed and the direction of CPO rethought, the proposals could be central to such an initiative.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>M<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Michael Gurstein [mailto:gurstein@gmail.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> March 9, 2016 7:48 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'Russell McOrmond' <russellmcormond@gmail.com>; 'cracin-canada' <cracin-canada@vcn.bc.ca><br><b>Cc:</b> 'TC Advisors' <advisors@tc.ca><br><b>Subject:</b> RE: [CommunityInformaticsCanada] FW: Delivering Community Power: A bold vision for an expanded postal service<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Thanks for this Russell,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Your comments are on target. However, I think an express objective of this initiative and why they are looking for a new mandate/extended set of activities for the Post Office is that they would like to see it re-nationalized. This is based on among other things the experiences you are pointing to below as well as the quite cavalier behaviour of the current President.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>M<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> <a href="mailto:cracin-canada-owner@vancouvercommunity.net">cracin-canada-owner@vancouvercommunity.net</a> [<a href="mailto:cracin-canada-owner@vancouvercommunity.net">mailto:cracin-canada-owner@vancouvercommunity.net</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Russell McOrmond<br><b>Sent:</b> March 9, 2016 6:17 AM<br><b>To:</b> cracin-canada <<a href="mailto:cracin-canada@vcn.bc.ca">cracin-canada@vcn.bc.ca</a>><br><b>Cc:</b> TC Advisors <<a href="mailto:advisors@tc.ca">advisors@tc.ca</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CommunityInformaticsCanada] FW: Delivering Community Power: A bold vision for an expanded postal service<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Michael Gurstein <<a href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com" target="_blank">gurstein@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Interesting proposal. Perhaps they should add community broadband/community wireless to the range of offerings.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>M</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> This would be an unfortunate move. For a number of reasons I don't think Canada Post has acted very community minded, and has failed in technology roll-outs even of technologies that are primary to their business.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Two examples:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>1) We have been fighting for decades to get postal code data released from Canada Post. While they consider this to be proprietary data, it is data that should be considered public in nature and made open access. Given Canada Post has been fighting this, it has been justifiably suggested that this activity be removed from Canada Post and handled by an accountable government agency. The idea of putting more public services in the hands of this proprietary minded organization suggests increased failures.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>2) The roll-out of the new community mailboxes has been a failure. I grew up with a community box which was a sturdy metal system with separate locks that could be individually purchased, as well as purchased from Canada Post. These were outdoor locks, intended to be used in robust weather conditions like we see in Canada. The new boxes use indoor locks, which means that it is impossible to pick up your mail during large parts of winter. Fortunately winter has been mild this year and there were fewer days of being frozen out of mail, but this is not something we should have to rely on. It is like some unaccountable bureaucrat at Canada Post forgot the Canada part of their name.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> These are just two examples that come to mind. If it were possible as a citizen/consumer to not use the services of Canada Post I would have done so already. Unfortunately the government imposes this organization on us, so we just have to put up with their failures.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> Please don't join calls or offer community support to add additional services to an organization that hasn't had a good track record, and will be more likely to fail than succeed at new services.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>-- <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <<a href="http://www.flora.ca/" target="_blank">http://www.flora.ca/</a>><br><br>Please help us tell the Canadian Parliament to protect our property rights as owners of Information Technology. Sign the petition! <a href="http://l.c11.ca/ict/" target="_blank">http://l.c11.ca/ict/</a><br><br>"The government, lobbied by legacy copyright holders and hardware manufacturers, can pry my camcorder, computer, home theatre, or portable media player from my cold dead hands!" <a href="http://c11.ca/own" target="_blank">http://c11.ca/own</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></body></html>