[BEN-L]BEN # 416

Adolf & Oluna Ceska aceska at telus.net
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:00:52 -0700


BBBBB    EEEEEE   NN   N             ISSN 1188-603X
BB   B   EE       NNN  N
BBBBB    EEEEE    NN N N             BOTANICAL
BB   B   EE       NN  NN             ELECTRONIC
BBBBB    EEEEEE   NN   N             NEWS
=20
No. 416                              October 20, 2009
=20
aceska@telus.net                     Victoria, B.C.
-----------------------------------------------------------
 Dr. A. Ceska, P.O.Box 8546, Victoria, B.C. Canada V8W 3S2
-----------------------------------------------------------

MUSHROOM POISONING: THE ROLE OF CARELESS IDENTIFICATIONS
From:  Michael W. Beug, Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee  =
BeugM@evergreen.edu=20
	Figures 1-12:  http://bomi.ou.edu/ben/416/ben416_figures.pdf  =20

I have always considered the consumption of edible wild mushrooms a safe =
and enjoyable, indeed healthful, pastime. I have my list of what I call =
55 mile per hour mushrooms that I can identify glancing out the window =
at highway speeds. I pass up other edible mushrooms that require a good =
spore print or microscopic analysis to be sure of the identification. =
However, lately when I am leading a group in the woods, I have been =
reluctant to assure others that even my 55 mile per hour mushrooms are =
foolproof. What follows are some accounts of recent misidentifications =
that stagger the imagination. You see, I collect and report on mushroom =
poisoning cases from throughout North America as chair of the North =
American Mycological Association Toxicology Committee.

In early September 2009, I received an email report of severe =
gastronomic upset affecting four people (probably in Wisconsin) who had =
consumed what was reportedly _Laetiporus sulphureus_ (Bull.) Murrill. I =
am used to getting reports of upset from the western look-alike, =
_Laetiporus conifericola_  Burds. & Banik (Figure 1). However, even with =
_Laetiporus conifericola_, I would not expect every person in the group =
to have become ill. I would expect at most one or two sensitive =
individuals to have suffered gastro-intestinal distress, not the whole =
group. Besides, it is very rare for someone to react to _Laetiporus =
sulphureus_ itself, just to its polypore look-alikes_ Laetiporus =
conifericola_ and _Laetiporus gilbertsonii_ Burds. The answer came a few =
days later in another email reporting that _Laetiporus sulphureus_  has =
a dangerous look-alike in eastern North America. The purported =
look-alike, and culprit in this story, was _Omphalotus illudens_ =
(Schwein.) Bresinsky & Besl (Figure 2). The most stunning aspect of this =
story is that a few years ago I received another report of someone =
serving Omphalotus illudens thinking it was _Laetiporus sulphureus_. To =
me this is like not being able to distinguish green apples and limes. =
The only things that the two have in common are that they both grow on =
trees and both are green. The only things _Laetiporus sulphureus_ and =
_Omphalotus illudens_ have in common is that they are both somewhat =
orange and both grow on wood. _Laetiporus sulphureus_ is a polypore and =
_Omphalotus illudens_ is a gilled mushroom =E2=80=93 how different can =
you get?

The same week I received a call from a poison center. They were fielding =
a call from a nurse at a hospital in another state who had identified a =
mushroom as _Amanita muscaria_ (L.) Lam.  (Figure 3). A young man had =
eaten 6-8 whole mushrooms in an apparent effort to get high and an hour =
had elapsed yet nothing was happening. The mushroom was described as =
having brown gills, among other features including bumps on the cap =
=E2=80=93 and _Amanita_ species have white gills unless old and rotting. =
Besides, consumption of 6-8 _Amanita muscaria_ would constitute a =
massive overdose =E2=80=93 1 or 2 caps are what someone would eat =
attempting to get high. Six to 8 would be an attempt at suicide, though =
even that amount probably would not kill a healthy individual. So what =
was the culprit? I asked if the nurse could be requested to send me =
pictures and shortly some fairly blurry pictures arrived in my email =
=E2=80=93 pictures of what was clearly an edible but bland and =
uninteresting species of _Pholiota_, possibly _Pholiota terrestris_ =
Overh. (Figure 4). I was stunned but considering other mistakes I have =
seen, not altogether surprised. _Amanita_ species have white gills that =
are not attached to the stipe and yield a white spore print. _Pholiota_ =
species have brown gills that are attached to the stipe and yield a =
brown spore print. _Amanita muscaria_ has warts on the cap that readily =
rub off or wash off in the rain. The scales on the cap of a _Pholiota_ =
are part of the cap structure and do not rub off.=20

_Amanita pantherina_ (DC.) Krombh. (Figure 5) has frequently been picked =
and eaten by persons who thought that they were eating _Agaricus =
augustus_ Fr. (Figure 6). Do people also have trouble telling cantaloupe =
from oranges? Mushrooms are very safe to pick and eat if you eat =
distinctive species like _Agaricus augustus_ so long as you read the =
description of the species and pay attention to what _Agaricus augustus_ =
looks like.

A tragic case of mistaken identification was reported in Macleans.ca in =
an August 27, 2009 article: =
http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/27/judith-josephine-koritar-1944-2009/   =

According to the article the woman picked what she thought was =
_Leucoagaricus naucinus_  (Fr.) Singer - syn.: _Lepiota naucina_ (Fr.) =
P. Kumm. (Figure 7). She actually picked a truly close look-alike, =
=E2=80=9CThe Destroying Angel=E2=80=9D or _Amanita virosa_ (Fr.) =
Bertill. (in reality it was most probably _Amanita bisporigera_ G.F. =
Atk., Figure 8). She checked her mushroom book and consumed the =
mushrooms which made her nauseous the next day and led to her death from =
_Aspergillosis_ 19 days later. Her mistakes were subtle =E2=80=93 she =
thought that the _Amanita_ only grew in the woods and so a lawn mushroom =
would be safe =E2=80=93 but not true if a tree is anywhere near. =
Virtually all _Amanita_ species are mycorrhizal associates of trees, but =
a tree can grow near a lawn. Her second mistake was in not collecting =
the entire base of the mushroom. The volva, or =E2=80=9Cdeath =
cup=E2=80=9D characteristic of the Destroying Angel group of mushrooms =
but not _Lepiota_ species, is often just below the surface of the ground =
and is easily missed by a careless picker. Thus one of my rules =
=E2=80=93 never eat an all-white gilled mushroom. By the way, the =
Destroying Angel mushrooms are exceptionally tasty =E2=80=93 and thus =
poison several careless people each year. And there is a green to tan =
deadly _Amanita_, _Amanita phalloides_ (Vaill. ex Fr.) Link (Figure 9) =
that came over on nursery stock from Europe over 100 years ago and is =
often found in urban areas.

I have another rule - never eat small gilled mushrooms. Several small =
_Lepiota_ species contain the same toxins as the =E2=80=9CDestroying =
Angel.=E2=80=9D  _Lepiota subincarnata_ J.E. Lange, also known as =
_Lepiota josserandii_ Bon & Boiffard (Figure 10) is one. Several =
_Galerina_ species like _Galerina marginata_ (Batsch) K=C3=BChner (alias =
_Galerina autumnalis_ (Peck) A.H. Sm. & Singer, Figure 11) have the same =
deadly toxin, =CE=B1-amanitin. Numerous small _Inocybe_  species contain =
a different toxin, muscarine. _Inocybe_ species like _Inocybe geophylla_ =
 (Pers.) P. Kumm. (Figure 12) can kill a small dog but in a human cause =
severe vomiting and diarrhoea, profuse salivation and tear formation and =
constricted pupils.

There is no reliable rule that will tell you that a mushroom is edible. =
Poisonous mushrooms are no more likely to turn a silver spoon black than =
an edible species, nor will they change the color of rice they are =
cooked with. To be safe you must know how to identify each species that =
you choose to eat.


VEGETATION-PLOT DATA AND DATABASES IN EUROPE
From: Schamin=C3=A9e J. H. J., Hennekens S. M., Chytr=C3=BD M. & Rodwell =
J. S. (2009): Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview. =
=E2=80=93 _Preslia_ 81: 173=E2=80=93185. Abstract.  Full article: =
http://www.preslia.cz/P093Schaminee.pdf=20

During the last decade many electronic databases of vegetation plots, =
mainly phytosociological relev=C3=A9s, were established in different =
European countries. These databases contain information which is =
extremely valuable for both testing various macroecological hypotheses =
and for nature conservation surveying or monitoring. The aim of this =
paper is to provide estimates of the number of vegetation plots there =
are in Europe, how many are stored in an electronic format and to assess =
their distribution across European countries and regions. We sent a =
questionnaire to the managers of national or regional databases of =
vegetation plots and other prominent vegetation ecologists. Meta-data =
obtained in this way indicate that there are > 4,300,000 vegetation-plot =
records in Europe, of which > 1,800,000 are already stored =
electronically. Of the electronic plots, 60% are stored in TURBOVEG =
databases. Most plot records probably exist in Germany, the Netherlands, =
France, Poland, Spain, Czech Republic, Italy, UK, Switzerland and =
Austria. The largest numbers of plots per unit area are in the =
Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and countries of central Europe. The most =
computerized plots per country exist in the Netherlands (600,000), =
followed by France, the Czech Republic and the UK. Due to its strong =
phytosociological tradition, Europe has many more vegetation plots than =
any other part of the world. This wealth of unique ecological =
information is a challenge for future biodiversity studies. With the =
alarming loss in biodiversity and environmental problems like global =
warming and ongoing changes in land use, there is an urgent need for =
wide-scale scientific and applied vegetation research. Developments of =
information systems such as SynBioSys Europe and facilitation of data =
flow between the national and regional databases should make it easier =
to use these vegetation-plot data.

Check also:

The International Association of Vegetation Scientists organizes a =
conference and workshop on

Vegetation databases and climate change
24 February - 26 February: 9th Meeting on Vegetation Databases
Hamburg, Germany
http://www.botanik.uni-greifswald.de/workshop2010.html?&L=3D1  =20
Contact: J=C3=BCrgen Dengler (dengler@botanik.uni-hamburg.de  )


BOOK ANNOUNCEMENT -  AUDUBON: BEYOND BIRDS

Small E.,  P.M. Catling, J. Cayouette, & B. Brookes. 2009.=20
_Plant portraits and conservation heritage of John James Audubon_.=20
NRC Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. xiv + 266 p.=20
ISBN-13: 978-0-660-19894-1 [hardcover]
CAN$49.95=20

Book available from NRC Press:=20
http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/books/books/9780660198941.html =20
Phone: 613-990-2254 or 1-800-668-1222; email: =
monographs.cisti@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca=20

John James Audubon was one of the world's greatest painters of wildlife. =
He is best known for _The Birds of America_, a gigantic four-volume set =
of 435 paintings that to this day remains one of the largest books ever =
produced, the most expensive book ever sold at auction and an artistic =
achievement almost without parallel. Audubon also prepared a similar =
three-volume set of 150 outstanding paintings of North American mammals. =
In the last 2 centuries, dozens of books have been produced, either =
stressing Audubon's work as pure art or documenting the animals that =
were painted. The present volume is unique in emphasizing the plants =
that Audubon frequently illustrated along with his animals. Superb, =
full-color reproductions are shown of more than 100 of Audubon's best =
paintings, chosen for their excellent portrayal of plants. Each =
magnificent full-page plate is accompanied by information on the animals =
(mostly birds), the painting and (most particularly) the plants. An =
introductory, extensively illustrated chapter details Audubon's life and =
career =E2=80=94 a fascinating story of heroic achievements in the face =
of great obstacles. A second chapter deals with Audubon's conservation =
legacy, a topic of considerable importance to the world's ongoing crises =
related to loss of biodiversity, degradation of the environment and =
global warming. This book will appeal to everyone who appreciates the =
stunning beauty of nature and the intriguing life stories of wild plants =
and animals.
=20

NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: RECENT BRYOLOGICAL PUBLICATIONS
From: William R. Buck, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458-5126, =
USA
	e-mail:  bbuck@nybg.org   =20

The New York Botanical Garden Press is pleased to offer two new titles =
for=20
Fall 2009:

Anderson,  Lewis E.,  A. Jonathan Shaw, & Blanka Shaw. 2009.
_Peat Mosses of the Southeastern United States._  (Memoirs of The New =
York Botanical Garden, Volume 102.)=20
New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, NY.   126 p. ISBN: 0-89327-505-0 =
[hardcover]  Price  US$42    Order no. M10200

Sphagnum, commonly known as peat moss, is widely used in agriculture,=20
horticulture, and floriculture. Living plants are colourful and add much =
to the=20
beauty of wetlands. It takes little training to recognize the genus, and =
most=20
of the sections are almost as easy to recognize. Yet they are scarcely =
noticed=20
by field botanists, and even bryologists tend to avoid them; they have a =

reputation of being taxonomically difficult but this applies only to a =
subset.

There are few taxonomic treatments of Sphagnum in North America, yet=20
it is a fascinating genus whose species comprise an integral part of =
nearly=20
all fresh-water wetlands. Almost all significant critical taxonomic =
characters=20
are microscopic and require dissections and staining, which can, with a =
little=20
practice, be easily self-taught. Even with a moderate amount of field=20
experience, however, a novice can learn to recognize sections and some =
species=20
in the field with certainty (although there are many species that even =
experts=20
cannot distinguish without a compound microscope). All field =
identifications=20
need to be confirmed microscopically. This volume will aid those who =
venture=20
into identifying peat mosses.


Gradstein S. Robbert, & Anna Luiza Ilkiu-Borges. 2009.
_Guide to the Plants of Central French Guiana Part 4. Liverworts and =
Hornworts_=20
(Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 76,4)  New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, =
NY.=20
144 p.   ISBN 0-89327-506-9  [hardcover] Price:  $52  /  Order no. =
M76P04

This hepatic flora of central French Guiana is based on the study of=20
about 1500 collections made by many different collectors. All species =
are=20
keyed, described, and illustrated. Brief descriptions of the habitats of =
the=20
species and of the lowland cloud forest of central French Guiana are =
also=20
provided.

The flora consists of 175 species of liverworts in 59 genera and
17 families and 2 species of hornworts (2 genera, 2 families). The=20
Lejeuneaceae are the most important family with 117 species in 37 =
genera.=20
Eight new taxa are introduced.

This much-anticipated volume is the fourth and final part of the Guide=20
to the Plants of Central French Guiana.

In addition, NYBG Press is offering a very special price on the entire =
four-
volume Guide to the Plants of Central French Guiana. Purchase all four =
books=20
for $128 -- a savings of $62 over the list price of $190. The set =
comprises=20
1,674 pages and 200 color plates. Part 1 treats pteridophytes, =
gymnosperms,=20
and monocotyledons; Part 2 covers the dicotyledons; Part 3 deals with =
mosses;=20
and the newly published Part 4 covers liverworts and hornworts.

To order, call 718-817-8721

________________________________________________________________
=20
Subscriptions: http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/ben-l=20
Send submissions to aceska@telus.net=20
BEN is archived at http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/=20
________________________________________________________________