|
To: The Collective Human Conscience
Subject: Khan Job: Bush Spiked Probe of Pakistan’s Dr.
Strangelove, BBC reported. Why?
|
Khan Job: Bush Spiked Probe of Pakistan’s Dr. Strangelove,
BBC reported in 2001
Monday, February 9, 2004
http://www.gregpalast.com/
On November 7, 2001, BBC TV and the Guardian of London
reported that the Bush administration thwarted
investigations of Dr. A.Q. Khan who this week confessed
selling atomic secrets to Libya, North Korea, and Iran.
The Bush Administration has expressed shock at the
disclosures that Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror,
has been running a nuclear secrets bazaar. In fact,
according to the British News Team’s sources’, Bush did not
know of these facts because, shortly after his inauguration,
his National Security Agency (NSA) defectively stymied the
probe of Khan Research Laboratories. CIA and other agents
could not investigate the spread of “Islamic Bombs” through
Pakistan because funding appeared to originate in Saudi
Arabia.
Greg Palast and David Pallister received a California State
University Project Censored Award for this expose based on
the story broadcast by Palast on BBC Television Newsnight.
According to both sources and documents obtained by the BBC,
the Bush Administration “Spike” of the investigation of Dr.
Khan’s Lab followed from a wider policy of protecting key
Saudi Arabians including the bin Laden Family.
Noam Chomsky, who read the story on page one of the Times of
India, has wondered, “Why wasn’t this all over US papers?”
To learn why, read the following excerpt from the 2003
edition of Palast’s book, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy:
The "Back-Off" Directive and the Islamic Bomb
Despite these tantalizing facts, Abdullah and his operations
were A-OK with the FBI chiefs, if not their working agents.
Just a dumb SNAFU? Not according to a top-level CIA
operative who spoke with us on condition of strictest
anonymity. After Bush took office, he said, "there was a
major policy shift" at the National Security Agency.
Investigators were ordered to "back off " from any inquiries
into Saudi Arabian financing of terror networks, especially
if they touched on Saudi royals and their retainers. That
put the bin Ladens, a family worth a reported $12 billion
and a virtual arm of the Saudi royal household, off limits
for investigation. Osama was the exception; he remained a
wanted man, but agents could not look too closely at how he
filled his piggy bank. The key rule of any investigation,
"follow the money," was now violated, and investigations-at
least before September 11-began to die.
And there was a lot to investigate-or in the case of the CIA
and FBI under Bush-a lot to ignore. Through well-known
international arms dealers (I'm sorry, but in this business,
sinners are better sources than saints) our team was tipped
off to a meeting of Saudi billionaires at the Hotel Royale
Monceau in Paris in May 1996 with the financial
representative of Osama bin Laden's network. The Saudis,
including a key Saudi prince joined by Muslim and non-Muslim
gun traffickers, met to determine who would pay how much to
Osama. This was not so much an act of support but of
protection-a pay off to keep the mad bomber away from Saudi
Arabia.
The crucial question here is that, if I could learn about
this meeting, how did the CIA miss it? In fact, since the
first edition of this book, other sources have disclosed
that the meeting was monitored by French intelligence. Since
U.S. intelligence was thus likely informed, the question
becomes why didn't the government immediately move against
the Saudis?
I probed our CIA contact for specifics of investigations
that
were hampered by orders to back off of the Saudis. He told
us that the Khan Laboratories investigation had been
effectively put on hold.
You may never have heard of Khan Laboratories, but if this
planet blows to pieces this year, it will likely be thanks
to Kahn Labs' creating nuclear warheads for Pakistan's
military. Because investigators had been tracking the
funding for this so-called "Islamic Bomb" back to Saudi
Arabia, under Bush security restrictions, the inquiry was
stymied. (The restrictions were lifted, the agent told me
without a hint of dark humor, on September 11.)
Dr. A. Q. Khan is the Dr. Strangelove of Pakistan, the
"father" of their bomb and, says a former associate, a
crusader for its testing . . . on humans. On April 25, 1998,
Kahn met at the Kushab Research Center with General Jehangir
Karamat, then army chief of staff, to plan a possible
preemptive nuclear strike on New Delhi, India. The Saudis
lit a fuse under this demented scheme by telling Pakistan
intelligence that Israel had shipped India warplanes in
preparation for a conventional attack on Pakistan. We only
know these details because a young researcher who claims he
was at the meeting wrote a horrified letter threatening to
make the plan to bomb India public, a threat which appears
to have halted the scheme. After writing down his
objections, the whistle-blower, Iftikhar Khan-Chaudhry, ran
for his life to London, then the USA, seeking asylum. Khan-Chaudhry,
when questioned, seemed to know too little to be the top
nuclear physicist he claimed, and far too much about A. Q.
Khan's bomb factory to be the tile company accountant
Pakistan claims. Pakistan police, failing to arrest him,
jailed, beat and raped his wife, suggesting they wanted him
to keep secret something more interesting than bookkeeping
methods. Whether his story was real or bogus, I can't
possibly tell. The point is that intelligence agencies under
Clinton, based on many other leads as well, were following
up on the Saudi connection until the Bush team interfered.
To unsubscribe from this list simply reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject header, or "re-subscribe" if you wish to resume