[Advisors] CAP futures workshop -- BC summit
James Van Leeuwen
jvl at ventus.ca
Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:26:58 -0700
--Apple-Mail=_E33DC003-74E2-4F72-8804-248BE40AADC4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Count me in Marita.
This might be a better title:=20
Advancing Community Access in Canada: Towards a Better Strategy
Roundtable? Moderated panel? Something else?
JvL
On 2012-01-08, at 4:13 PM, Marita Moll wrote:
> Yup, we could do that. We could even suggest two workshops -- one on =
CAP specifically and the broader discussion below which would be very =
appropriate.
>=20
> Of course, in both cases, we will need some volunteers to present =
ideas that would start the discussions.
>=20
> Marita
>=20
> At 04:58 PM 08/01/2012, James Van Leeuwen wrote:
>> Marita,
>>=20
>> the branding solution needs to be part of a broader strategic =
solution for improving community access, and perhaps this should be the =
topic of the workshop.
>>=20
>> E.g.,
>>=20
>> Community Access in Canada: Defining a Strategy for Growth
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> This invites a discussion around all potential strategies, including =
strategies that have little or nothing to do with CAP.
>>=20
>> Strategies built around fostering community leadership and investment =
will be the most effective, and are likely to attract the most support =
from senior government.
>>=20
>>=20
>> JvL
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 2012-01-08, at 12:32 PM, Marita Moll wrote:
>>=20
>> > Yes, I would think so. That alternative has to be addressed.
>> >
>> > Marita
>> >
>> > At 02:01 PM 08/01/2012, Garth Graham wrote:
>> >> On 2012-01-08, at 9:04 AM, Marita Moll wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > It will specifically seek input on how to reposition the program =
to meet current policy objectives and how to sell that vision to elected =
representatives.
>> >>
>> >> Does the way this sentence is worded leave the door open for =
discussion of alternates that leave the feds out of the loop?
>> >>
>> >> GG
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Advisors mailing list
>> >> Advisors@tc.ca
>> >> http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Advisors mailing list
>> > Advisors@tc.ca
>> > http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> Advisors mailing list
>> Advisors@tc.ca
>> http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Advisors mailing list
> Advisors@tc.ca
> http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors
--Apple-Mail=_E33DC003-74E2-4F72-8804-248BE40AADC4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Count =
me in Marita.<div><br></div><div>This might be a better =
title: </div><div><br></div><div><b>Advancing Community Access in =
Canada: Towards a =
Better Strategy</b></div><div><div><br></div><div>Roundtable? =
Moderated panel? Something =
else?</div><div><br></div><div>JvL</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div=
><br><div><div>On 2012-01-08, at 4:13 PM, Marita Moll wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>Yup, =
we could do that. We could even suggest two workshops -- one on =
CAP specifically and the broader discussion below which would be very =
appropriate.<br><br>Of course, in both cases, we will need some =
volunteers to present ideas that would start the =
discussions.<br><br>Marita<br><br>At 04:58 PM 08/01/2012, James Van =
Leeuwen wrote:<br><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">Marita,<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">the branding =
solution needs to be part of a broader strategic solution for improving =
community access, and perhaps this should be the topic of the =
workshop.<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">E.g.,<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">Community =
Access in Canada: Defining a Strategy for =
Growth<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">This invites a =
discussion around all potential strategies, including strategies that =
have little or nothing to do with CAP.<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">Strategies =
built around fostering community leadership and investment will be the =
most effective, and are likely to attract the most support from senior =
government.<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">JvL<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">On 2012-01-08, =
at 12:32 PM, Marita Moll wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">> Yes, I =
would think so. That alternative has to be =
addressed.<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">> =
Marita<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">> At =
02:01 PM 08/01/2012, Garth Graham wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">>> On 2012-01-08, at 9:04 AM, Marita Moll =
wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">>><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">>> =
> It will specifically seek input on how to reposition the program to =
meet current policy objectives and how to sell that vision to elected =
representatives.<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">>><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">>> =
Does the way this sentence is worded leave the door open for discussion =
of alternates that leave the feds out of the =
loop?<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">>><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">>> =
GG<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">>><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">>> =
_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquot=
e type=3D"cite">>> Advisors mailing =
list<br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">>> <a =
href=3D"mailto:Advisors@tc.ca">Advisors@tc.ca</a><br></blockquote><blockqu=
ote type=3D"cite">>> <a =
href=3D"http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors">http://victoria.t=
c.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors</a><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">> =
_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquot=
e type=3D"cite">> Advisors mailing list<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">> <a =
href=3D"mailto:Advisors@tc.ca">Advisors@tc.ca</a><br></blockquote><blockqu=
ote type=3D"cite">> <a =
href=3D"http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors">http://victoria.t=
c.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors</a><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockqu=
ote><blockquote type=3D"cite">Advisors mailing =
list<br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><a =
href=3D"mailto:Advisors@tc.ca">Advisors@tc.ca</a><br></blockquote><blockqu=
ote type=3D"cite"><a =
href=3D"http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors">http://victoria.t=
c.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors</a><br></blockquote><br><br><br>___________=
____________________________________<br>Advisors mailing list<br><a =
href=3D"mailto:Advisors@tc.ca">Advisors@tc.ca</a><br>http://victoria.tc.ca=
/mailman/listinfo/advisors<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></b=
ody></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_E33DC003-74E2-4F72-8804-248BE40AADC4--