[Advisors] Fwd: link to recording of Looking Toward WSIS+20

Marita Moll mmoll at ca.inter.net
Thu Mar 16 16:06:14 PDT 2023


Thanks Garth. I didn't see this and it is a pretty good summary. 
Although I am not on-site, I can tell from the sessions I have been 
attending virtually that this topic created a lot of buzz and everyone 
is on board, itching to find out how best to participate.

Marita

On 2023-03-16 5:48 p.m., Garth Graham wrote:
>
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From: *ICANN At-Large Staff via ALAC-Announce 
>> <alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> *Subject: **[ALAC-Announce] ICANN76 Ends Today! Read the Newsletter 
>> for Highlights From the Last Day*
>> *Date: *March 16, 2023 at 7:45:23 AM PDT
>> *To: *ALAC Announce <alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> *Reply-To: *ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>>
>> *Looking Toward WSIS+20***
>>
>> /This session took place on Wednesday, 15 March. If you missed it or 
>> want to review, visit the 
>> /https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uGdMHrQne4 
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uGdMHrQne4> /the available session 
>> materials and recording./
>> The ICANN76 plenary session started with an introduction of the main 
>> goals of the upcoming World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) 
>> review process from Nigel Hickson. Moderator Sébastien Bachollet 
>> introduced himself and outlined the program of explaining the history 
>> and landscape of WSIS, discussing the WSIS+20 review process, and 
>> sharing stakeholder views.
>> ·Carlos Afonso discussed the original WSIS assemblies and the goals 
>> and achievements that arose from them.
>> ·Wolfgang Kleinwächter expanded on the relationship between 
>> stakeholders and the importance of multistakeholder governance.
>> ·Anriette Esterhuysen discussed the value of WSIS and the WSIS+20 
>> review process.
>> ·Desiree Miloshevic expressed concern that the WSIS+20 review process 
>> will take place under the framework set by the United Nations General 
>> Assembly, which may not be as open as a multistakeholder approach.
>> ·Emily Taylor emphasized the successes of the multistakeholder model, 
>> as shown by the IANA stewardship transition.
>> ·Raúl Echeberría expressed concern that one possible result of 
>> WSIS+20 is that the Internet Governance Forum mandate will not be 
>> renewed, emphasizing the importance of being innovative.
>> ·Olga Cavalli said that ICANN has the foundation to become a strong 
>> voice and relevant stakeholder in Internet governance.
>> ·Jordan Carter stressed the importance of evolving the 
>> multistakeholder model to remain relevant and encourage ICANN to take 
>> the lead in Internet governance discussions.
>> ·Lynn St. Amour said that fostering collaborative information sharing 
>> efforts across the Internet community can help ICANN to stay 
>> innovative and impactful.
>> ·Barbara Wanner provided a four-step plan to help ensure that 
>> government organizations hear stakeholder opinions.
>> ·Lori Schulman suggested using the technical community to advise 
>> public policymakers.
>> ·Marita Moll reiterated the importance of empowering end users on how 
>> to be involved in governmental efforts.
>> Throughout the plenary session, moderator Bachollet welcomed 
>> questions from an active audience. The commenters called for ICANN to 
>> participate in WSIS+20 and to consider how it can be a more effective 
>> advocate for multistakeholder Internet governance.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Advisors mailing list
> Advisors at tc.ca
> http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://victoria.tc.ca/pipermail/advisors/attachments/20230316/dc5cd804/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Advisors mailing list