[Advisors] Let community re-think community

Sun, 6 May 2012 12:06:33 -0600

--Apple-Mail=_B7478D45-53D2-4B37-8226-26AC2BB47450
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

A great nation is like a great man:
When he makes a mistake, he realizes it.
Having realized it, he admits it.
Having admitted it, he corrects it.
He considers those who point out his faults=20
as his most benevolent teachers.

=97Stephen Mitchell=92s modern translation of the Tao Te Ching, in =
homage to Lao Tzu  (ca. 500 B.C.)

On 2012-05-06, at 11:03 AM, Gary Kenward wrote:

> As compared to say the US (have you followed the republican primary)? =
Or the Greeks?
>=20
> Regardless, the first step is to stop beating ourselves up over what =
we are not.
>=20
> Gary
>=20
>=20
> On 12.05.06 1:32 PM, "James Van Leeuwen" <jvl@ventus.ca> wrote:
>=20
>> It says that Canadians still don't have the emotional and =
intellectual maturity for substantive discourse around morals and =
values.
>>=20
>> It says we need to grow up.
>>=20
>> James
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 2012-05-05, at 1:22 PM, Garth Graham wrote:
>>=20
>> > On 2012-05-05, at 12:19 AM, James Van Leeuwen wrote:
>> >=20
>> >> Garth asks:
>> >> What kind of a society do we want? =85  I think the very essence =
of the challenge we Canadians face today is that we have so many =
conflicting visions of what we want our society to look like. =85  What =
we lack is sufficient moral capital to bind the nation into a common and =
cohesive society with a meaningful purpose and a coherent vision for =
itself.  =85  Without an appealing new moral vision and narrative to =
bind us together, collaboration and cooperation across groups will be =
next to impossible.
>> >=20
>> > James, I congratulate you on risking discussion of values when, =
from my experience, the tolerance of Canadians for matters philosophical =
is pretty limited.  The first and only time I dared wade into that =
debate about narrative was in June of 1994 (see attached report of a =
workshop on electronic democracy).  The report predicts, accurately, =
that without ongoing discussion of values there would be no real basis =
for effective public policies about Canada's transformation into a =
digital society.  What does a silence that's now 18 years deep say about =
the current content of public policy?
>> >=20
>> > GG
>> >=20
>> > <Values debate.rtf>
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> Advisors mailing list
>> Advisors@tc.ca
>> http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors
>=20
>=20
> Gary Kenward
>=20
> THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

--Apple-Mail=_B7478D45-53D2-4B37-8226-26AC2BB47450
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=windows-1252

<html><head></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><span =
class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-family: Times; "><p =
style=3D"line-height: 1.2; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 19px; =
"><b><i><span style=3D"font-family: 'Palatino Linotype', serif; ">A =
great nation is like a great man:<br>When he makes a mistake, he =
realizes it.<br>Having realized it, he admits it.<br>Having admitted it, =
he corrects it.<br>He considers those who point out his =
faults&nbsp;<br>as his most benevolent =
teachers.</span></i></b></p><ul><div style=3D"line-height: 1.2; =
margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; "><span style=3D"font-family: =
'Palatino Linotype', serif; ">=97Stephen Mitchell=92s modern translation =
of the Tao Te Ching, in homage to Lao Tzu&nbsp; (ca. 500 =
B.C.)</span></div></ul></span><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div=
><div><div>On 2012-05-06, at 11:03 AM, Gary Kenward wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type=3D"cite">

<title>Re: [Advisors] Let community re-think community</title>

<div>
As compared to say the US (have you followed =
the republican primary)? Or the Greeks? 
 
Regardless, the first step is to stop beating ourselves up over what we =
are not. 
 
Gary 
 
 
On 12.05.06 1:32 PM, "James Van Leeuwen" &lt;<a =
href=3D"x-msg://1172/jvl@ventus.ca">jvl@ventus.ca</a>&gt; wrote: 
 
<blockquote type=3D"cite">It says that Canadians still don't have the emotional and =
intellectual maturity for substantive discourse around morals and =
values. 
 
It says we need to grow up. 
 
James 
 
 
 
On 2012-05-05, at 1:22 PM, Garth Graham wrote: 
 
&gt; On 2012-05-05, at 12:19 AM, James Van Leeuwen wrote: 
&gt; 
&gt;&gt; Garth asks: 
&gt;&gt; What kind of a society do we want? =85 &nbsp;I think the very =
essence of the challenge we Canadians face today is that we have so many =
conflicting visions of what we want our society to look like. =85 =
&nbsp;What we lack is sufficient moral capital to bind the nation into a =
common and cohesive society with a meaningful purpose and a coherent =
vision for itself. &nbsp;=85 &nbsp;Without an appealing new moral vision =
and narrative to bind us together, collaboration and cooperation across =
groups will be next to impossible. 
&gt; 
&gt; James, I congratulate you on risking discussion of values when, =
from my experience, the tolerance of Canadians for matters philosophical =
is pretty limited. &nbsp;The first and only time I dared wade into that =
debate about narrative was in June of 1994 (see attached report of a =
workshop on electronic democracy). &nbsp;The report predicts, =
accurately, that without ongoing discussion of values there would be no =
real basis for effective public policies about Canada's transformation =
into a digital society. &nbsp;What does a silence that's now 18 years =
deep say about the current content of public policy? 
&gt; 
&gt; GG 
&gt; 
&gt; &lt;Values debate.rtf&gt; 
 
_______________________________________________ 
Advisors mailing list 
<a href=3D"x-msg://1172/Advisors@tc.ca">Advisors@tc.ca</a> 
<a =
href=3D"http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors">http://victoria.t=
c.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors</a> 
</blockquote> 
 
<hr align=3D"CENTER" size=3D"3" width=3D"95%">Gary =
Kenward 
 
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PRIVATE AND =
CONFIDENTIAL 

</div>

</blockquote></div><br></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_B7478D45-53D2-4B37-8226-26AC2BB47450--