[Advisors] Re TC and Bill C-51

[Darlene Thompson]

Agreed.

D

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Garth Graham <garth.graham at telus.net>
wrote:

> I agree - especially since, when it passes as it will, the act of radical
> dissent inherent in signing such a petition demonstrates an intent to
> destabilize peace, order, and good government in Canada. Dissent are us!
>
> This morning a friend sent me an article from the New York Times re
> censorship by the “Great Cannon” in China. <
> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/11/technology/china-is-said-to-use-powerful-new-weapon-to-censor-internet.html?emc=eta1&_r=0
> >
>
> There’s quote in it that reads:
> > “The position of the Chinese government is that efforts to serve what it
> views as hostile content inside China’s borders is a hostile and
> provocative act that is a threat to its regime stability and ultimately its
> national security.”
>
> Sad that it reads just as well revised as follows:
> “The position of the Canadian government is that efforts to serve what it
> views as hostile content inside Canada's borders is a hostile and
> provocative act that is a threat to its regime stability and ultimately its
> national security.”
>
> GG
>
>
> > On Apr 10, 2015, at 8:06 AM, mmoll at ca.inter.net wrote:
> >
> > Hello Advisors.  As a member of ISOC I received a message asking ISOC to
> join the petition against Bill C-51.  We, as TC, haven't done anything on
> this yet.  I would advise signing on to the petition.
> >
> > What are your thoughts.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Advisors mailing list
> Advisors at tc.ca
> http://victoria.tc.ca/mailman/listinfo/advisors
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://victoria.tc.ca/pipermail/advisors/attachments/20150410/ac812499/attachment.html>